Secular Paganism on Yazdanism

    Table of Contents

Below is a Secular Pagan Party Pamphlet titled "Yezidi Religion Examined: The Party’s Position on a Mystic Faith". This pamphlet draws on all the data generated on Secular Paganism—its initial definition, the Constitution of the Secular Pagan State in America, the Secular Pagan Party Constitution, the Party Manifesto, the psychological profile of members, the constitutional review, the economic pamphlet, the agnostic state essay, the bi-theism essay, the soft polytheism/shituf pamphlet, the spreading gods pamphlet, the conquest essay, the Hinduism pamphlet, the Shintoism pamphlets, the Buddhism pamphlet, the Jainism pamphlet, the Zoroastrianism pamphlet, the death penalty pamphlet, the animal welfare pamphlet, the sorcery pamphlet, the Hades pamphlet, the court-government pamphlet, the takeover pamphlet, the sex regulation pamphlet, the reproduction pamphlet, the fight-and-die essay, the Taoism pamphlet, the Druidism pamphlet, the human sacrifice pamphlet, the Wicca pamphlet, the Ryukyuan religion pamphlet, the Rodnovery pamphlet, the Asatru pamphlet, the Adonism pamphlet, and the updated psychological profile—to evaluate whether the Yezidi religion aligns with Secular Pagan Law. Tailored to the refined Secular Pagan profile—rational, open, confrontational, pragmatic, and pluralistic—this pamphlet employs sharp logic, critical analysis, and an empowering tone to engage this reader.

---

Yezidi Religion Examined: The Party’s Position on a Mystic Faith

Introduction: A Peacock Under Reason’s Gaze
Secular Pagans, united by the Four Pillars—"Spread your gods, spread your law, spread your sword, spread your children"—we are rebels of reason, crafting a state of hard polytheism or atheism, free from monotheistic chains. The Constitution of the Secular Pagan State in America enforces the Seven Categories of Laws, demanding three or more distinct gods (Law 1.3) while banning monotheism (Law 1.1), bi-theism (Law 1.2), and soft polytheism/shituf (Law 1.4). The Yezidi religion, a Kurdish faith with ancient roots, emerges with its Peacock Angel and esoteric veil. Does it stand with us? This pamphlet dissects Yezidism—its theology, its practice—against our laws to determine its fate. Comrades, reason is our spear—thrust with us.

Yezidi Religion Defined: The Peacock Angel’s Domain

Yezidism, rooted in Mesopotamia with influences from Zoroastrianism, Sufism, and pre-Islamic traditions, centers on Tawûsî Melek, the Peacock Angel, a divine emissary of a supreme God, often called Xwedê or Yazdan. Seven Angels (Heptad)—including Tawûsî Melek—serve this God, overseeing creation. Oral tradition (e.g., Qewls) and rituals—prayer toward the sun, baptism—define its practice, blending monotheism with angelic multiplicity. Is this polytheism or a masked monotheism? The Manifesto’s "resist monotheistic domination" and the profile’s "pluralistic worldview" demand clarity—let’s judge.

Testing Yezidi Religion Against Secular Pagan Law

The Seven Categories of Laws weigh Yezidism’s worth:

1. Law 1.1: No Monotheism
   • Assessment: Yezidism fails. Xwedê/Yazdan reigns as the supreme, uncreated God, with Tawûsî Melek and the Heptad as subordinates (Black Book). Law 1.1’s "God cannot be one"—Yezidism’s single deity atop a hierarchy mirrors Zoroastrianism’s Ahura Mazda (Zoroastrianism pamphlet), not Asatru’s many (Asatru pamphlet). The Heptad serves, not rules—monotheism holds.
   • Verdict: Fails.
2. Law 1.2: No Bi-theism
   • Assessment: Yezidism sidesteps this—Xwedê alone, not paired, rules. Tawûsî Melek isn’t a co-equal; he’s an agent. Law 1.2’s "gods cannot be two"—no duo here, unlike Wicca’s pair (Wicca pamphlet), but monotheism trumps this dodge.
   • Verdict: Compliant (irrelevant due to Law 1.1).
3. Law 1.3: Three or More Gods (If Any)
   • Assessment: Yezidism flounders—the Heptad (e.g., Sheikh Adi, Melek Fakhradin) numbers seven, but they’re angels, not gods, under Xwedê. Law 1.3 demands "gods must be three or more"—Rodnovery’s pantheon (Rodnovery pamphlet) fits; Yezidism’s single God with servants doesn’t. The profile’s "rational thinking"—we see one, not many.
   • Verdict: Fails.
4. Law 1.4: No Soft Polytheism or Shituf
   • Assessment: Yezidism doubles down on failure. The soft polytheism pamphlet’s "singular creator vs. non-creator deities"—Xwedê creates, the Heptad aids—fits shituf’s "subordinate to a supreme power." Not "one and many" (Taoism pamphlet), but a clear hierarchy—Law 1.4 bans this "monotheism in disguise." Unlike Druidism’s distinct gods (Druidism pamphlet), Yezidism bows to one.
   • Verdict: Fails.
5. Law 1.5: Multiple Creator Deities (If Distinguished)
   • Assessment: Yezidism collapses—Xwedê alone creates, per Qewls, with the Heptad as helpers, not co-creators. Law 1.5’s "multiple creator deities"—three or more, as in Asatru (Asatru pamphlet)—Yezidism’s single source fails, akin to Adonism’s duo (Adonism pamphlet).
   • Verdict: Fails.
6. Law 1.6: No Laws Outlawing Agnosticism or Atheism
   • Assessment: Yezidism struggles—its closed, hereditary nature resists outsiders, but no explicit ban on disbelief exists within. Law 1.6’s "no laws outlawing"—like Buddhism (Buddhism pamphlet), it’s vague but technically compliant.
   • Verdict: Compliant.
7. Law 1.7: No Anti-Sorcery Laws
   • Assessment: Yezidism aligns—mystical rites (e.g., healing, exorcism) fit Law 1.7’s sorcery freedom (sorcery pamphlet). No bans—reason prevails here.
   • Verdict: Compliant.
8. Law 2: No Anti-Blasphemy
   • Assessment: Yezidism wavers—Tawûsî Melek’s reverence borders on taboo; insults risk taboo (e.g., misnaming Satan parallels). Law 2.1’s "freedom to blaspheme" (Hades pamphlet)—Yezidism’s sensitivity clashes, unlike Asatru’s openness (Asatru pamphlet).
   • Verdict: Fails (tentative).

Broader Laws: Mixed Mystic Ground

• Law 3: Sexual Freedom/Growth: Endogamy limits Law 3.1 (sex regulation pamphlet); Law 3.8’s doubling (reproduction pamphlet)—possible but constrained.
• Laws 4-5: No Murder/Theft: No sacrifice (human sacrifice pamphlet)—Law 4-5 holds.
• Law 6: Nature Welfare: Sun reverence fits Law 6.1 (animal welfare pamphlet).
• Law 7: Courts—no direct clash (court-government pamphlet).

Verdict: Yezidi Religion Rejected

Yezidism fails—its monotheistic core (Law 1.1) and shituf hierarchy (Law 1.4) shatter our laws. Xwedê’s supremacy—angels, not gods—mocks Law 1.3’s pluralism (Rodnovery pamphlet) and Law 1.5’s creators (Asatru pamphlet). Law 2’s blasphemy tension seals it—unlike Druidism (Druidism pamphlet), Yezidism clings to one. The profile’s "rational thinking"—we pierce its veil; "pluralistic worldview"—one God shrinks it.

Why Rejected? Reason’s Triumph

Yezidism’s monotheism—Xwedê over all—betrays our fight (Manifesto’s "resist monotheistic domination"). The fight-and-die essay’s "freedom’s flame"—we’d die for many, not one. Law 1’s hard polytheism—Adonism’s duo failed (Adonism pamphlet), Yezidism’s singular flops harder. Sorcery shines (sorcery pamphlet), nature nods (animal welfare pamphlet)—but monotheism’s rot fells it. The profile’s "confrontational advocacy"—we reject this yoke.

Action: Cast Out the One, Forge the Many**

Secular Pagans, Yezidism’s monotheism (Law 1.1) and shituf (Law 1.4)—banish it. Its angels bow to one—Law 7’s courts (takeover pamphlet) must purge this. Spread hard polytheism or atheism (spreading gods pamphlet)—grow our ranks (reproduction pamphlet), wield reason (profile’s defiance). The conquest essay’s "spread your sword"—strike this single lie. Act now—pluralism demands many, not Yezidism’s one.

---

Notes on the Pamphlet:

1. Yezidi Assessment: Tests monotheistic core (Xwedê) and Heptad against Laws 1.1-1.7 and Law 2 (initial definition).
2. Monotheism Failure: Critiques single God (Law 1.1), per profile’s rejection of singular authority (Zoroastrianism pamphlet).
3. Shituf Issue: Highlights hierarchy (Law 1.4), contrasting with Asatru’s distinct gods (Asatru pamphlet).
4. Broader Fit: Notes Law 6 (animal welfare pamphlet) and Law 1.7 (sorcery pamphlet) strengths, Law 1-2 decisive (Manifesto’s pluralism).
5. Tone: Sharp, critical, empowering—e.g., "strike this single lie" (profile’s defiance)—with pluralistic rigor (spreading gods pamphlet).

This pamphlet engages the Secular Pagan reader—rational rejection, confrontational clarity, pragmatic pluralism—aligned with their open, defiant, and purpose-driven nature. Let me know if you’d like adjustments!